Paper detail

Electrostatic enhancement of particle collision rates in atmospheric flows

Collisional growth of tiny particles is a fundamental process governing the growth of cloud droplets and the aggregation of ash particles in volcanic plumes, with direct implications for precipitation formation, cloud lifetime, and ash plume dynamics. The particles in these scenarios often carry electric charges. In this study, we investigate the collision dynamics of a pair of like charged dielectric spheres subjected to a uniaxial compressional flow, an important linear flow that captures key features of atmospheric straining motions. Finite particle size leads to electrostatic interactions that deviate from the point charge approximation, resulting in far field repulsion and near-field attraction, which in turn generate nontrivial particle trajectories and critical collision thresholds. For certain combinations of charge and size, the interplay between hydrodynamic and electrostatic forces creates strong radially inward particle relative velocities that substantially alter particle pair dynamics and modify the conditions required for contact. For uncharged particles, collision efficiency increases monotonically with particle size ratio. However, in the presence of electrostatic forces with high charge ratio values, the collision efficiency exhibits a nonmonotonic dependence, attaining a maximum at small size ratios and decreasing as the ratio increases, with a crossover beyond which larger particles become less favorable for collision. These results demonstrate that the same polarity charges on finite sized atmospheric particles do not necessarily inhibit collisions. Instead, they can enhance collisional growth for specific charge and size ratio combinations, revealing counterintuitive pathways relevant to cloud microphysical processes and volcanic ash aggregation in electrified atmospheric environments.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.