Paper detail

Electron transport across a metal/MoS$_2$ interface: dependence on contact area and binding distance

We investigate the nature of electron transport through monolayer molybdenum dichalcogenides (MoX$_2$, X=S, Se) suspended between Au and Ti metallic contacts. The monolayer is placed ontop of the close-packed surfaces of the metal electrodes and we focus on the role of the metal-MoX$_2$ binding distance and the contact area. Based on \emph{ab initio} transport calculations we identify two different scattering mechanisms which depend differently on the metal-MoX$_2$ binding distance: (i) An interface resistance between the metal and the supported part of MoX$_2$ which decreases with decreasing binding distance and increasing contact area. (ii) An edge resistance across the 1D interface between metal-supported and free-standing MoX$_2$ which increases with decreasing binding distance and is independent on contact area. The origin of the edge resistance is a metal-induced potential shift within the MoX$_2$ layer. The optimal metal thus depends on the junction geometry. In the case of MoS$_2$, we find that for short contacts, L$<$6 nm, Ti electrodes (with short binding distance) gives the lowest resistance, while for longer contacts, Au (large binding distance) is a better electrode metal.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.