Paper detail

Electron paramagnetic resonance of n-type silicon and germanium for applications in 3D thermometry

While several 2D thermometry techniques exist, there is a lack of 3D thermometry techniques that work for wide range of materials and offer good resolution in time, space and temperature. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging can provide 3D temperature information. However, XRD is typically limited to crystalline materials while NMR is largely limited to liquids where the resonance lines are narrow. We investigate electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of n-type silicon and germanium for 3D thermometry. While in germanium the EPR linewidths are too broad, EPR linewidths in silicon are reasonably narrow and exhibit a strong temperature dependence. The temperature dependence of the spin-lattice relaxation rate (1/T1) of conduction electrons in n-type Si for low dopant concentrations follows a T^3 law due to phonon broadening. For heavily doped Si, which is desirable for good signal to noise ratio (SNR) for application in thermometry, impurity scattering is expected to decrease the temperature dependence of 1/T1. Our results show, in heavily doped n-type Si, spin-lattice relaxation induced by impurity scattering does not drastically decrease the temperature dependence of EPR linewidths. In P-doped Si with donor concentration of 7 x 10^18 /cm^3, the EPR linewidth has a T^(5/2) temperature dependence; the temperature dependence decreases to T^(3/2) when the donor concentration is 7 x 10^19 /cm^3. While the temperature dependence of linewidth decreases for heavier doping, EPR linewidth is still a sensitive thermometer. We define a figure of merit for SNR for thermometry from EPR linewidths of n-type Si and observe that increasing the doping results in a better SNR. Using effective medium theory, we show that EPR linewidth can be a sensitive thermometer for application in 3D thermometry with systems embedding microparticles of heavily doped n-type Si.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.