Paper detail

Electromagnetic Shower Reconstruction and Energy Validation with Michel Electrons and $π^0$ Samples for the Deep-Learning-Based Analyses in MicroBooNE

This article presents the reconstruction of the electromagnetic activity from electrons and photons (showers) used in the MicroBooNE deep learning-based low energy electron search. The reconstruction algorithm uses a combination of traditional and deep learning-based techniques to estimate shower energies. We validate these predictions using two $ν_μ$-sourced data samples: charged/neutral current interactions with final state neutral pions and charged current interactions in which the muon stops and decays within the detector producing a Michel electron. Both the neutral pion sample and Michel electron sample demonstrate agreement between data and simulation. Further, the absolute shower energy scale is shown to be consistent with the relevant physical constant of each sample: the neutral pion mass peak and the Michel energy cutoff.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
MicroBooNE collaborationP. AbratenkoR. AnJ. AnthonyL. ArellanoJ. AsaadiA. AshkenaziS. BalasubramanianB. BallerC. BarnesG. BarrV. BasqueL. Bathe-PetersO. Benevides RodriguesS. BerkmanA. BhanderiA. BhatM. BishaiA. BlakeT. BoltonJ. Y. BookL. CamilleriD. CaratelliI. Caro TerrazasF. CavannaG. CeratiY. ChenD. CianciJ. M. ConradM. ConveryL. Cooper-TroendleJ. I. Crespo-AnadonM. Del TuttoS. R. DennisP. DetjeA. DevittR. DiurbaR. DorrillK. DuffyS. DytmanB. EberlyA. EreditatoJ. J. EvansR. FineG. A. Fiorentini AguirreR. S. FitzpatrickB. T. FlemingN. FoppianiD. FrancoA. P. FurmanskiD. Garcia-GamezS. GardinerG. GeS. GollapinniO. GoodwinE. GramelliniP. GreenH. GreenleeW. GuR. GuenetteP. GuzowskiL. HagamanO. HenC. HilgenbergG. A. Horton-SmithA. HourlierR. ItayC. JamesX. JiL. JiangJ. H. JoR. A. JohnsonY. J. JwaD. KalraN. KampN. KaneshigeG. KaragiorgiW. KetchumM. KirbyT. KobilarcikI. KresloI. LepeticK. LiY. LiK. LinB. R. LittlejohnW. C. LouisX. LuoK. ManivannanC. MarianiD. MarsdenJ. MarshallD. A. Martinez CaicedoK. MasonA. MastbaumN. McConkeyV. MeddageT. MettlerK. MillerJ. MillsK. MistryT. MohayaiA. MoganJ. MoonM. MooneyA. F. MoorC. D. MooreL. Mora LepinJ. MousseauM. MurphyD. NaplesA. Navrer-AgassonM. Nebot-GuinotR. K. NeelyD. A. NewmarkJ. NowakM. NunesO. PalamaraV. PaoloneA. PapadopoulouV. PapavassiliouS. F. PateN. PatelA. PaudelZ. PavlovicE. PiasetzkyI. Ponce-PintoS. PrinceX. QianJ. L. RaafV. RadekaA. RafiqueM. Reggiani-GuzzoL. RenL. C. J. RiceL. RochesterJ. Rodriguez RondonM. RosenbergM. Ross-LonerganG. ScanaviniD. W. SchmitzA. SchukraftW. SeligmanM. H. ShaevitzR. SharankovaJ. ShiJ. SinclairA. SmithE. L. SniderM. SoderbergS. Soldner-RemboldP. SpentzourisJ. SpitzM. StancariJ. St. JohnT. StraussK. SuttonS. Sword-FehlbergA. M. SzelcW. TangK. TeraoC. ThorpeD. TotaniM. ToupsY. -T. TsaiM. A. UchidaT. UsherW. Van De PontseeleB. VirenM. WeberH. WeiZ. WilliamsS. WolbersT. WongjiradM. WospakrikK. WresiloN. WrightW. WuE. YandelT. YangG. YarbroughL. E. YatesH. W. YuG. P. ZellerJ. ZennamoC. Zhang
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

MicroBooNE collaborationP. AbratenkoR. AnJ. AnthonyL. ArellanoJ. AsaadiA. AshkenaziS. BalasubramanianB. BallerC. BarnesG. BarrV. BasqueL. Bathe-PetersO. Benevides RodriguesS. BerkmanA. BhanderiA. BhatM. BishaiA. BlakeT. BoltonJ. Y. BookL. CamilleriD. CaratelliI. Caro TerrazasF. CavannaG. CeratiY. ChenD. CianciJ. M. ConradM. ConveryL. Cooper-TroendleJ. I. Crespo-AnadonM. Del TuttoS. R. DennisP. DetjeA. DevittR. DiurbaR. DorrillK. DuffyS. DytmanB. EberlyA. EreditatoJ. J. EvansR. FineG. A. Fiorentini AguirreR. S. FitzpatrickB. T. FlemingN. FoppianiD. FrancoA. P. FurmanskiD. Garcia-GamezS. GardinerG. GeS. GollapinniO. GoodwinE. GramelliniP. GreenH. GreenleeW. GuR. GuenetteP. GuzowskiL. HagamanO. HenC. HilgenbergG. A. Horton-SmithA. HourlierR. ItayC. JamesX. JiL. JiangJ. H. JoR. A. JohnsonY. J. JwaD. KalraN. KampN. KaneshigeG. KaragiorgiW. KetchumM. KirbyT. KobilarcikI. KresloI. LepeticK. LiY. LiK. LinB. R. LittlejohnW. C. LouisX. LuoK. ManivannanC. MarianiD. MarsdenJ. MarshallD. A. Martinez CaicedoK. MasonA. MastbaumN. McConkeyV. MeddageT. MettlerK. MillerJ. MillsK. MistryT. MohayaiA. MoganJ. MoonM. MooneyA. F. MoorC. D. MooreL. Mora LepinJ. MousseauM. MurphyD. NaplesA. Navrer-AgassonM. Nebot-GuinotR. K. NeelyD. A. NewmarkJ. NowakM. NunesO. PalamaraV. PaoloneA. PapadopoulouV. PapavassiliouS. F. PateN. PatelA. PaudelZ. PavlovicE. PiasetzkyI. Ponce-PintoS. PrinceX. QianJ. L. RaafV. RadekaA. RafiqueM. Reggiani-GuzzoL. RenL. C. J. RiceL. RochesterJ. Rodriguez RondonM. RosenbergM. Ross-LonerganG. ScanaviniD. W. SchmitzA. SchukraftW. SeligmanM. H. ShaevitzR. SharankovaJ. ShiJ. SinclairA. SmithE. L. SniderM. SoderbergS. Soldner-RemboldP. SpentzourisJ. SpitzM. StancariJ. St. JohnT. StraussK. SuttonS. Sword-FehlbergA. M. SzelcW. TangK. TeraoC. ThorpeD. TotaniM. ToupsY. -T. TsaiM. A. UchidaT. UsherW. Van De PontseeleB. VirenM. WeberH. WeiZ. WilliamsS. WolbersT. WongjiradM. WospakrikK. WresiloN. WrightW. WuE. YandelT. YangG. YarbroughL. E. YatesH. W. YuG. P. ZellerJ. ZennamoC. Zhang

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.