Paper detail

Elastic scattering of 17F, 17O and 19F on a heavy target in microscopic continuum discretized coupled-channels method

Background: Microscopic description of the projectile, based on an effective NN interaction, in a microscopic CDCC (MCDCC) model [PRL 111, 082701 (2013)] has been successfully applied to the 7Li+208Pb scattering. Purpose: The MCDCC method is applied to the low energy elastic scattering of 17F, 17O and 19F on 58Ni and 208Pb targets. The goal of the calculations is twofold - to test the adequacy and the accuracy of the MCDCC model for the heavier projectiles, and to study the contribution of various channels to the elastic scattering cross sections. Methods: The elastic scattering cross sections are calculated using the MCDCC method. The nucleon-target optical potential is folded with the projectile densities resulting from an effective NN interaction, which includes central nuclear, spin-orbit and Coulomb terms. Discretization of the continuum is achieved via the pseudo state method. Coupled equations are solved using the R-matrix method on a Lagrange mesh. Results: For the test case of 17F at 10 MeV/nucleon, the cross sections are weakly sensitive to the choice of the effective NN interaction, three different energy dependent optical nucleon-target potentials provide a similar reasonable agreement with data. Just below the Coulomb barrier, the MCDCC significantly underestimates the cross sections at larger angles. The coupling to continuum is not significant in most of the assessed cases. Conclusions: The MCDCC is very satisfactory in the sense, that it includes the microscopic properties of the projectile in a reaction model. Well above the Coulomb barrier, the cross sections are in a good agreement with data. The reasons for the discrepancy between the data and the calculated cross sections at the lower energies, which is also observed in a traditional CDCC, are unclear.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.