Paper detail

Eigenvector 1: An Optimal Correlation Space for Active Galactic Nuclei

We identify a correlation space involving optical and UV emission line parameters as well as the soft X-ray spectral index that provides optimal discrimination between all principal classes of active galactic nuclei. Most of the sources in our three high quality data samples show a strong intercorrelation with narrow line Seyfert 1 (NLSy1) galaxies and steep spectrum radio galaxies occupying opposite extrema in the space. NLSy1 sources show a clear continuity with broader line sources indicating that they are not a disjoint class of AGN as is sometimes suggested. We interpret the principal intercorrelation in the parameter space as being driven by AGN luminosity to black hole mass ratio (L/M prop. to the Eddington ratio). Source orientation no doubt also plays an important role but it is not yet clear whether FWHM H beta or CIV 1549 line shift is the better indicator. We tentatively identify two RQ populations: an almost pure RQ population A with FWHM<=4000 and population B which occupies the same parameter domain as the flat spectrum RL sources. A possible interpretation sees Pop. A/NLSy1 as lower mass/high accretion rate sources and Pop. B/RL sources the opposite.

preprint2000arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.