Paper detail

Efficient Task Allocation in Smart Warehouses with Multi-delivery Stations and Heterogeneous Robots

The task allocation problem in multi-robot systems (MRTA) is an NP-hard problem whose viable solutions are usually found by heuristic algorithms. Considering the increasing need of improvement on logistics, the use of robots for increasing the efficiency of logistics warehouses is becoming a requirement. In a smart warehouse the main tasks consist of employing a fleet of automated picking and mobile robots that coordinate by picking up items from a set of orders from the shelves and dropping them at the delivery stations. Two aspects generally justify multi-robot task allocation complexity: (i) environmental aspects, such as multi-delivery stations and dispersed robots (since they remain in constant motion) and (ii) fleet heterogeneity, where robots' traffic speed and capacity loads are different from each other. Despite these properties have been widely researched in the literature, they usually are investigated separately. This work proposes a scalable and efficient task allocation algorithm for smart warehouses with multi-delivery stations and heterogeneous fleets. Our strategy employs a novel cost estimator, which computes costs as a function of the robots' variable characteristics and capacity while they receive new tasks. For validating the strategy a series of experiments is performed simulating the operation of smart warehouses with multiple delivery stations and heteregenous fleets. The results show that our strategy generates routes costing up to $33$\% less than the routes generated by a state-of-the-art task allocation algorithm and $96$\% faster in test instances representing our target scenario. Considering single-delivery stations and non-dispersed robots, we reduced the number of robots by up to $18$\%, allocating tasks $92$\% faster, and generating routes whose costs are statistically similar to the routes generated by the state-of-the-art algorithm.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.