Paper detail

Efficient Parallel Algorithms for k-Center Clustering

The k-center problem is one of several classic NP-hard clustering questions. For contemporary massive data sets, RAM-based algorithms become impractical. And although there exist good sequential algorithms for k-center, they are not easily parallelizable. In this paper, we design and implement parallel approximation algorithms for this problem. We observe that Gonzalez's greedy algorithm can be efficiently parallelized in several MapReduce rounds; in practice, we find that two rounds are sufficient, leading to a 4-approximation. We contrast this with an existing parallel algorithm for k-center that runs in a constant number of rounds, and offers a 10-approximation. In depth runtime analysis reveals that this scheme is often slow, and that its sampling procedure only runs if k is sufficiently small, relative to the input size. To trade off runtime for approximation guarantee, we parameterize this sampling algorithm, and find in our experiments that the algorithm is not only faster, but sometimes more effective. Yet the parallel version of Gonzalez is about 100 times faster than both its sequential version and the parallel sampling algorithm, barely compromising solution quality.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.