Paper detail

Efficient Neural Net Approaches in Metal Casting Defect Detection

One of the most pressing challenges prevalent in the steel manufacturing industry is the identification of surface defects. Early identification of casting defects can help boost performance, including streamlining production processes. Though, deep learning models have helped bridge this gap and automate most of these processes, there is a dire need to come up with lightweight models that can be deployed easily with faster inference times. This research proposes a lightweight architecture that is efficient in terms of accuracy and inference time compared with sophisticated pre-trained CNN architectures like MobileNet, Inception, and ResNet, including vision transformers. Methodologies to minimize computational requirements such as depth-wise separable convolution and global average pooling (GAP) layer, including techniques that improve architectural efficiencies and augmentations, have been experimented. Our results indicate that a custom model of 590K parameters with depth-wise separable convolutions outperformed pretrained architectures such as Resnet and Vision transformers in terms of accuracy (81.87%) and comfortably outdid architectures such as Resnet, Inception, and Vision transformers in terms of faster inference times (12 ms). Blurpool fared outperformed other techniques, with an accuracy of 83.98%. Augmentations had a paradoxical effect on the model performance. No direct correlation between depth-wise and 3x3 convolutions on inference time, they, however, they played a direct role in improving model efficiency by enabling the networks to go deeper and by decreasing the number of trainable parameters. Our work sheds light on the fact that custom networks with efficient architectures and faster inference times can be built without the need of relying on pre-trained architectures.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.