Paper detail

Efficient ML Models for Practical Secure Inference

ML-as-a-service continues to grow, and so does the need for very strong privacy guarantees. Secure inference has emerged as a potential solution, wherein cryptographic primitives allow inference without revealing users' inputs to a model provider or model's weights to a user. For instance, the model provider could be a diagnostics company that has trained a state-of-the-art DenseNet-121 model for interpreting a chest X-ray and the user could be a patient at a hospital. While secure inference is in principle feasible for this setting, there are no existing techniques that make it practical at scale. The CrypTFlow2 framework provides a potential solution with its ability to automatically and correctly translate clear-text inference to secure inference for arbitrary models. However, the resultant secure inference from CrypTFlow2 is impractically expensive: Almost 3TB of communication is required to interpret a single X-ray on DenseNet-121. In this paper, we address this outstanding challenge of inefficiency of secure inference with three contributions. First, we show that the primary bottlenecks in secure inference are large linear layers which can be optimized with the choice of network backbone and the use of operators developed for efficient clear-text inference. This finding and emphasis deviates from many recent works which focus on optimizing non-linear activation layers when performing secure inference of smaller networks. Second, based on analysis of a bottle-necked convolution layer, we design a X-operator which is a more efficient drop-in replacement. Third, we show that the fast Winograd convolution algorithm further improves efficiency of secure inference. In combination, these three optimizations prove to be highly effective for the problem of X-ray interpretation trained on the CheXpert dataset.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.