Paper detail

Efficient Methods and Parallel Execution for Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis with Parameter Tuning on Microscopy Imaging Datasets

Background: We describe an informatics framework for researchers and clinical investigators to efficiently perform parameter sensitivity analysis and auto-tuning for algorithms that segment and classify image features in a large dataset of high-resolution images. The computational cost of the sensitivity analysis process can be very high, because the process requires processing the input dataset several times to systematically evaluate how output varies when input parameters are varied. Thus, high performance computing techniques are required to quickly execute the sensitivity analysis process. Results: We carried out an empirical evaluation of the proposed method on high performance computing clusters with multi-core CPUs and co-processors (GPUs and Intel Xeon Phis). Our results show that (1) the framework achieves excellent scalability and efficiency on a high performance computing cluster -- execution efficiency remained above 85% in all experiments; (2) the parameter auto-tuning methods are able to converge by visiting only a small fraction (0.0009%) of the search space with limited impact to the algorithm output (0.56% on average). Conclusions: The sensitivity analysis framework provides a range of strategies for the efficient exploration of the parameter space, as well as multiple indexes to evaluate the effect of parameter modification to outputs or even correlation between parameters. Our work demonstrates the feasibility of performing sensitivity analyses, parameter studies, and auto-tuning with large datasets with the use of high-performance systems and techniques. The proposed technologies will enable the quantification of error estimations and output variations in these pipelines, which may be used in application specific ways to assess uncertainty of conclusions extracted from data generated by these image analysis pipelines.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.