Paper detail

Efficient Exact Algorithms for Maximum Balanced Biclique Search in Bipartite Graphs

Given a bipartite graph, the maximum balanced biclique (\textsf{MBB}) problem, discovering a mutually connected while equal-sized disjoint sets with the maximum cardinality, plays a significant role for mining the bipartite graph and has numerous applications. Despite the NP-hardness of the \textsf{MBB} problem, in this paper, we show that an exact \textsf{MBB} can be discovered extremely fast in bipartite graphs for real applications. We propose two exact algorithms dedicated for dense and sparse bipartite graphs respectively. For dense bipartite graphs, an $\mathcal{O}^{*}( 1.3803^{n})$ algorithm is proposed. This algorithm in fact can find an \textsf{MBB} in near polynomial time for dense bipartite graphs that are common for applications such as VLSI design. This is because, using our proposed novel techniques, the search can fast converge to sufficiently dense bipartite graphs which we prove to be polynomially solvable. For large sparse bipartite graphs typical for applications such as biological data analysis, an $\mathcal{O}^{*}( 1.3803^{\ddotδ})$ algorithm is proposed, where $\ddotδ$ is only a few hundreds for large sparse bipartite graphs with millions of vertices. The indispensible optimizations that lead to this time complexity are: we transform a large sparse bipartite graph into a limited number of dense subgraphs with size up to $\ddotδ$ and then apply our proposed algorithm for dense bipartite graphs on each of the subgraphs. To further speed up this algorithm, tighter upper bounds, faster heuristics and effective reductions are proposed, allowing an \textsf{MBB} to be discovered within a few seconds for bipartite graphs with millions of vertices. Extensive experiments are conducted on synthetic and real large bipartite graphs to demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our proposed algorithms and techniques.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.