Paper detail

Efficient Evaluation of the Partition Function of RBMs with Annealed Importance Sampling

Probabilistic models based on Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) imply the evaluation of normalized Boltzmann factors, which in turn require from the evaluation of the partition function Z. The exact evaluation of Z, though, becomes a forbiddingly expensive task as the system size increases. This even worsens when one considers most usual learning algorithms for RBMs, where the exact evaluation of the gradient of the log-likelihood of the empirical distribution of the data includes the computation of Z at each iteration. The Annealed Importance Sampling (AIS) method provides a tool to stochastically estimate the partition function of the system. So far, the standard use of the AIS algorithm in the Machine Learning context has been done using a large number of Monte Carlo steps. In this work we show that this may not be required if a proper starting probability distribution is employed as the initialization of the AIS algorithm. We analyze the performance of AIS in both small- and large-sized problems, and show that in both cases a good estimation of Z can be obtained with little computational cost.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.