Paper detail

Efficient Dispersion on an Anonymous Ring in the Presence of Weak Byzantine Robots

The problem of dispersion of mobile robots on a graph asks that $n$ robots initially placed arbitrarily on the nodes of an $n$-node anonymous graph, autonomously move to reach a final configuration where exactly each node has at most one robot on it. This problem is of significant interest due to its relationship to other fundamental robot coordination problems, such as exploration, scattering, load balancing, relocation of self-driving electric cars to recharge stations, etc. The robots have unique IDs, typically in the range $[1,poly(n)]$ and limited memory, whereas the graph is anonymous, i.e., the nodes do not have identifiers. The objective is to simultaneously minimize two performance metrics: (i) time to achieve dispersion and (ii) memory requirement at each robot. This problem has been relatively well-studied when robots are non-faulty. In this paper, we introduce the notion of Byzantine faults to this problem, i.e., we formalize the problem of dispersion in the presence of up to $f$ Byzantine robots. We then study the problem on a ring while simultaneously optimizing the time complexity of algorithms and the memory requirement per robot. Specifically, we design deterministic algorithms that attempt to match the time lower bound ($Ω(n)$ rounds) and memory lower bound ($Ω(\log n)$ bits per robot). Our main result is a deterministic algorithm that is both time and memory optimal, i.e., $O(n)$ rounds and $O(\log n)$ bits of memory required per robot, subject to certain constraints. We subsequently provide results that require less assumptions but are either only time or memory optimal but not both. We also provide a primitive, utilized often, that takes robots initially gathered at a node of the ring and disperses them in a time and memory optimal manner without additional assumptions required.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.