Paper detail

Efficiency of isothermal active matter engines: Strong driving beats weak driving

We study microscopic engines that use a single active particle as their "working medium". Part of the energy required to drive the directed motion of the particle can be recovered as work, even at constant temperature. A wide class of synthetic active particles can be captured by schematically accounting for the chemical degrees of freedom that power the directed motion without having to resolve the exact microscopic mechanism. We derive analytical results for the quasi-static thermodynamic efficiency, i.e., the fraction of available chemical energy that can be recovered as mechanical work. While this efficiency is vanishingly small for colloidal particles, it increases as the dissipation is increased beyond the linear response regime and goes through a maximum at large propulsion speeds. Our results demonstrate that driving beyond the linear response regime has non-trivial consequences for the efficiency of active engines.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.