Paper detail

Efficiency Evaluation of Banks with Many Branches using a Heuristic Framework and Dynamic Data Envelopment Optimization Approach: A Real Case Study

Evaluating the efficiency of organizations and branches within an organization is a challenging issue for managers. Evaluation criteria allow organizations to rank their internal units, identify their position concerning their competitors, and implement strategies for improvement and development purposes. Among the methods that have been applied in the evaluation of bank branches, non-parametric methods have captured the attention of researchers in recent years. One of the most widely used non-parametric methods is the data envelopment analysis (DEA) which leads to promising results. However, the static DEA approaches do not consider the time in the model. Therefore, this paper uses a dynamic DEA (DDEA) method to evaluate the branches of a private Iranian bank over three years (2017-2019). The results are then compared with static DEA. After ranking the branches, they are clustered using the K-means method. Finally, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis approach is introduced to help the managers to decide about changing variables to shift a branch from one cluster to a more efficient one.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.