Paper detail

Efficiency at maximum power output of linear irreversible Carnot-like heat engines

The efficiency at maximum power output of linear irreversible Carnot-like heat engines is investigated based on the assumption that the rate of irreversible entropy production of working substance in each "isothermal" process is a quadratic form of heat exchange rate between the working substance and the reservoir. It is found that the maximum power output corresponds to minimizing the irreversible entropy production in two "isothermal" processes of the Carnot-like cycle, and that the efficiency at maximum power output has the form as $η_{mP}={η_C}/(2-γη_C)$ where $η_C$ is the Carnot efficiency while $γ$ depends on the heat transfer coefficients between the working substance and two reservoirs. The value of $η_{mP}$ is bounded between $η_{-}\equiv η_C/2$ and $η_{+}\equivη_C/(2-η_C)$. These results are consistent with those obtained by Chen and Yan [J. Chem. Phys. \textbf{90}, 3740 (1989)] based on the endoreversible assumption, those obtained by Esposito \textit{et al.} [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{105}, 150603 (2010)] based on the low-dissipation assumption, and those obtained by Schmiedl and Seifert [EPL \textbf{81}, 20003 (2008)] for stochastic heat engines which in fact also satisfy the low-dissipation assumption. Additionally, we find that the endoreversible assumption happens to hold for Carnot-like heat engines operating at the maximum power output based on our fundamental assumption, and that the Carnot-like heat engines that we focused does not strictly satisfy the low-dissipation assumption, which implies that the low-dissipation assumption or our fundamental assumption is a sufficient but non-necessary condition for the validity of $η_{mP}={η_C}/(2-γη_C)$ as well as the existence of two bounds $η_{-}\equiv η_C/2$ and $η_{+}\equivη_C/(2-η_C)$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.