Paper detail

Effects of finite probe size on self-affine roughness measurements

The roughness of fracture surfaces has been shown to exhibit self-affne scale invariance for a wide variety of materials and loading conditions. The range of scales over which this regime extends remains a matter of debate, together with the universality of the associated exponents. The topography of these surfaces is however often investigated with a contact probe that is larger than the micro-structure. In this case, we show that the correlation function of the roughness and the corresponding Hurst exponent $ζ$ can only be measured down to a length scale $Δxc$ which depends on the probe size $R$, on $ζ$ and on the surface topothesy $l$, and exhibit spurious behavior at smaller scales. First, we derive the dependence of $Δxc$ on these parameters from a simple scaling argument. Then we study this dependence numerically and verify our theoretical prediction. Finally, we establish the relevance of this analysis from AFM measurements on an experimental glass fracture surface and provide a metrological procedure for roughness measurements.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.