Paper detail

Effects of Disorder on the Transport of Collective Modes in an Excitonic Condensate

An excitonic insulator (EI) is an unconventional quantum phase of matter in which excitons, bound pairs of electrons and holes, undergo Bose--Einstein condensation, forming a macroscopic coherent state. While its existence was first hypothesized half a century ago, the EI has eluded experimental observation in bulk materials for decades. In the last few years, a resurgence of interest in the subject has been driven by the identification of several candidate materials suspected to support an excitonic condensate. However, one obstacle in verifying the nature of these systems has been to find signatures of the EI that distinguish it from a normal insulator. To address this, we focus on a clear qualitative difference between the two phases: the existence of Goldstone modes born by the spontaneous breaking of a $U(1)$ symmetry in the EI. Even if this mode is gapped, as occurs in the case of an approximate symmetry, this branch of collective modes remains a fundamental feature of the low-energy dynamics of the EI provided the symmetry-breaking is small. We study a simple model that realizes an excitonic condensate, and use mean field theory within the random-phase approximation to determine its collective modes. We subsequently develop a diagrammatic method to incorporate the effects of disorder perturbatively, and use it to determine the scattering rate of the collective modes. We interpret our results within an an effective field theory. The collective modes are found to be robust against symmetry-preserving disorder, implying an experimental fingerprint unique to the EI: the ballistic propagation of low-lying modes over mesoscopic distances, at electronic-scale velocities. We suggest this could affect thermal transport at low temperatures, and could be observed via spatially-resolved pump-probe spectroscopy through the coherent response of phonons that hybridize with the collective modes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.