Paper detail

Effects of decoherence on the shot noise in carbon nanotubes

We study the zero frequency noise in an interacting quantum wire connected to leads, in the presence of an impurity. In the absence of quasiparticle decoherence the zero-frequency noise is that of a non-interacting wire. However, if the collective, fractionally-charged modes have a finite lifetime, we find that the zero-frequency noise may still exhibit signatures of charge fractionalization, such as a small but detectable reduction of the ratio between the noise and the backscattered current (Fano factor). We argue that this small reduction of the Fano factor is consistent with recent observations of a large reduction in the experimentally-inferred Fano factor in nanotubes (calculated assuming that the backscattered current is the difference between the ideal current in a multiple-channel non-interacting wire and the measured current.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.