Paper detail

Effects of Crowding Perception on Self-organized Pedestrian Flows Using Adaptive Agent-based Model

Pedestrian behavior has much more complicated characteristics in a dense crowd and thus attracts the widespread interest of scientists and engineers. However, even successful modeling approaches such as pedestrian models based on particle systems are still not fully considered the perceptive mechanism underlying collective pedestrian behavior. This paper extends a behavioral heuristics-based pedestrian model to an adaptive agent-based model, which explicitly considers the crowding effect of neighboring individuals and perception anisotropy on the representation of a pedestrians visual information. The adaptive agents with crowding perception are constructed to investigate complex, selforganized collective dynamics of pedestrian motion. The proposed model simulates selforganized pedestrian flows in good quantitative agreement with empirical data. The selforganized phenomena include lane formation in bidirectional flow and fundamental diagrams of unidirectional flow. Simulation results show that the emergence of lane formation in bidirectional flow can be well reproduced. To investigate this further, increasing view distance has a significant effect on reducing the number of lanes, increasing lane width, and stabilizing the self-organized lanes. The paper also discusses phase transitions of fundamental diagrams of pedestrian crowds with unidirectional flow. It is found that the heterogeneity of how pedestrians perceive crowding in the population has a remarkable impact on the flow quality, which results in the buildup of congestion and rapidly decreases the efficiency of pedestrian flows. It also indicates that the concept of heterogeneity may be used to explain the instability of phase transitions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.