Paper detail

Effective Deterministic Initialization for $k$-Means-Like Methods via Local Density Peaks Searching

The $k$-means clustering algorithm is popular but has the following main drawbacks: 1) the number of clusters, $k$, needs to be provided by the user in advance, 2) it can easily reach local minima with randomly selected initial centers, 3) it is sensitive to outliers, and 4) it can only deal with well separated hyperspherical clusters. In this paper, we propose a Local Density Peaks Searching (LDPS) initialization framework to address these issues. The LDPS framework includes two basic components: one of them is the local density that characterizes the density distribution of a data set, and the other is the local distinctiveness index (LDI) which we introduce to characterize how distinctive a data point is compared with its neighbors. Based on these two components, we search for the local density peaks which are characterized with high local densities and high LDIs to deal with 1) and 2). Moreover, we detect outliers characterized with low local densities but high LDIs, and exclude them out before clustering begins. Finally, we apply the LDPS initialization framework to $k$-medoids, which is a variant of $k$-means and chooses data samples as centers, with diverse similarity measures other than the Euclidean distance to fix the last drawback of $k$-means. Combining the LDPS initialization framework with $k$-means and $k$-medoids, we obtain two novel clustering methods called LDPS-means and LDPS-medoids, respectively. Experiments on synthetic data sets verify the effectiveness of the proposed methods, especially when the ground truth of the cluster number $k$ is large. Further, experiments on several real world data sets, Handwritten Pendigits, Coil-20, Coil-100 and Olivetti Face Database, illustrate that our methods give a superior performance than the analogous approaches on both estimating $k$ and unsupervised object categorization.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.