Paper detail

Effect of randomness in logistic maps

We study a random logistic map $x_{t+1} = a_{t} x_{t}[1-x_{t}]$ where $a_t$ are bounded ($q_1 \leq a_t \leq q_2$), random variables independently drawn from a distribution. $x_t$ does not show any regular behaviour in time. We find that $x_t$ shows fully ergodic behaviour when the maximum allowed value of $a_t$ is $4$. However $< x_{t \to \infty}>$, averaged over different realisations reaches a fixed point. For $1\leq a_t \leq 4$ the system shows nonchaotic behaviour and the Lyapunov exponent is strongly dependent on the asymmetry of the distribution from which $a_t$ is drawn. Chaotic behaviour is seen to occur beyond a threshold value of $q_1$ ($q_2$) when $q_2$ ($q_1$) is varied. The most striking result is that the random map is chaotic even when $q_2$ is less than the threshold value $3.5699......$ at which chaos occurs in the non random map. We also employ a different method in which a different set of random variables are used for the evolution of two initially identical $x$ values, here the chaotic regime exists for all $q_1 \neq q_2 $ values.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.