Paper detail

Effect of pressure on the anomalous response functions of a confined water monolayer at low temperature

We study a coarse-grained model for a water monolayer that cannot crystallize due to the presence of confining interfaces, such as protein powders or inorganic surfaces. Using both Monte Carlo simulations and mean field calculations, we calculate three response functions: the isobaric specific heat $C_P$, the isothermal compressibility $K_T$, and the isobaric thermal expansivity $α_P$. At low temperature $T$, we find two distinct maxima in $C_P$, $K_T$ and $|α_P|$, all converging toward a liquid-liquid critical point (LLCP) with increasing pressure $P$. We show that the maximum in $C_P$ at higher $T$ is due to the fluctuations of hydrogen (H) bond formation and that the second maximum at lower $T$ is due to the cooperativity among the H bonds. We discuss a similar effect in $K_T$ and $|α_P|$. If this cooperativity were not taken into account, both the lower-$T$ maximum and the LLCP would disappear. However, comparison with recent experiments on water hydrating protein powders provides evidence for the existence of the lower-$T$ maximum, supporting the hypothesized LLCP at positive $P$ and finite $T$. The model also predicts that when $P$ moves closer to the critical $P$ the $C_P$ maxima move closer in $T$ until they merge at the LLCP. Considering that other scenarios for water are thermodynamically possible, we discuss how an experimental measurement of the changing separation in $T$ between the two maxima of $C_P$ as $P$ increases could determine the best scenario for describing water.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.