Paper detail

Effect of Dimensionality on the Percolation Threshold of Overlapping Nonspherical Hyperparticles

A set of lower bounds on the continuum percolation threshold $η_c$ of overlapping convex hyperparticles of general nonspherical (anisotropic) shape with a specified orientational probability distribution in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space have been derived [S. Torquato, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 136}, 054106 (2012)]. The simplest of these lower bounds is given by $η_c \ge v/v_{ex}$, where $v_{ex}$ is the $d$-dimensional exclusion volume of a hyperparticle and $v$ is its $d$-dimensional volume. In order to study the effect of dimensionality on the threshold $η_c$ of overlapping nonspherical convex hyperparticles with random orientations here, we obtain a scaling relation for $η_c$ that is based on this lower bound and a conjecture that hyperspheres provide the highest threshold among all convex hyperparticle shapes for any $d$. This scaling relation exploits the principle that low-dimensional continuum percolation behavior encodes high-dimensional information. We derive a formula for the exclusion volume $v_{ex}$ of a hyperparticle in terms of its $d$-dimensional volume $v$, surface area $s$ and {\it radius of mean curvature} ${\bar R}$ (or, equivalently, {\it mean width}). These basic geometrical properties are computed for a wide variety of nonspherical hyperparticle shapes with random orientations across all dimensions, including, among other shapes, various polygons for $d=2$, Platonic solids, spherocylinders, parallepipeds and zero-volume plates for $d=3$ and their appropriate generalizations for $d \ge 4$. We then compute the lower bound and scaling relation for $η_c$ for this comprehensive set of continuum percolation models across dimensions. We show that the scaling relation provides accurate {\it upper-bound} estimates of the threshold $η_c$ across dimensions and becomes increasingly accurate as the space $d$ increases.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.