Paper detail

Edge-preserving self-healing: keeping network backbones densely connected

Healing algorithms play a crucial part in distributed P2P networks where failures occur continuously and frequently. Several self-healing algorithms have been suggested recently [IPDPS'08, PODC'08, PODC'09, PODC'11] in a line of work that has yielded gradual improvements in the properties ensured on the graph. This work motivates a strong general phenomenon of edge-preserving healing that aims at obtaining self-healing algorithms with the constraint that all original edges in the graph (not deleted by the adversary), be retained in every intermediate graph. The previous algorithms, in their nascent form, are not explicitly edge preserving. In this paper, we show they can be suitably modified (We introduce Xheal+, an edge-preserving version of Xheal[PODC'11]). Towards this end, we present a general self-healing model that unifies the previous models. The main contribution of this paper is not in the technical complexity, rather in the simplicity with which the edge-preserving property can be ensured and the message that this is a crucial property with several benefits. In particular, we highlight this by showing that, almost as an immediate corollary, subgraph densities are preserved or increased. Maintaining density is a notion motivated by the fact that in certain distributed networks, certain nodes may require and initially have a larger number of inter-connections. It is vital that a healing algorithm, even amidst failures, respect these requirements. Our suggested modifications yield such subgraph density preservation as a by product. In addition, edge preservation helps maintain any subgraph induced property that is monotonic. Also, algorithms that are edge-preserving require minimal alteration of edges which can be an expensive cost in healing - something that has not been modeled in any of the past work.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.