Paper detail

Edge and sublayer degrees of freedom for phosphorene nanoribbons with twofold-degenerate edge bands via electric field

For the pristine phosphorene nanoribbons (PNRs) with edge states, there exist two categories of edge bands near the Fermi energy (EF), i.e., the shuttle-shaped twofold-degenerate and the near-flat simple degenerate edge bands. However, the usual experimental measurement may not distinguish the difference between the two categories of edge bands. Here we study the varying rule for the edge bands of PNRs under an external electrostatic field. By using the KWANT code based on the tight-binding approach, we find that the twofold-degenerate edge bands can be divided into two separated shuttles until the degeneracy is completely removed and a gap near EFis opened under a sufficiently strong in-plane electric field. Importantly, each shuttle from the ribbon upper or lower edge outmost atoms is identified according to the local density of states. However, under a small off-plane field the shuttle-shaped bands are easily induced into two near-flat bands contributed from the edge atoms of the top and bottom sublayers, respectively. The evidence provides the edge and sublayer degrees of freedom (DOF) for the PNRs with shuttle-shaped edge bands, of which is obviously different from another category PNRs intrinsically with near-flat edge bands. This is because that the former category of ribbons solely have four zigzag-like atomic configurations at the edges in each unit cell, which also results in that the property is robust against the point defect in the ribbon center area. As an application, furthermore, based on this issue we propose a homogenous junction of a shuttle-edge-band PNR attached by two electric gates. Interestingly, the transport property of the junction with field manipulation well reflects the characteristics of the two DOFs. These findings may provide a further understanding on PNRs and initiate new developments in PNR-based electronics.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.