Paper detail

Edge-AI-Driven Learning-to-Rank for Decentralized Task Allocation in Circular Smart Manufacturing

Task allocation in smart manufacturing systems needs to operate under decentralized decision-making, dynamic workloads, and shared resource constraints. In circular manufacturing settings, these challenges are further intensified by the need to balance operational efficiency with resource and energy sustainability. While learning-based approaches have been explored, many focus on predicting absolute performance metrics that do not necessarily translate into improved allocation outcomes, since decentralized assignment is governed by the relative ordering of candidate machines. This work proposes an Edge-AI-driven decentralized task allocation framework based on ranking-aware negotiation, where lightweight decision intelligence is embedded at the machine level to enable low-latency coordination without centralized control. The framework is developed progressively: a resource-aware heuristic first establishes the decentralized bidding structure, an Edge-AI-based regression model then provides learned local bid approximation, and a ranking-aware formulation finally reshapes the learning objective to align with the ordering-based nature of winner selection. Each machine evaluates incoming tasks using local information, including processing capability, queue state, and resource contention. The framework is evaluated via discrete-event simulation under high-load and tight-deadline scenarios using delay, deadline violations, throughput, and energy consumption. Results show improved delay and deadline adherence under high load, and enhanced energy efficiency under tighter constraints, leading to more resource-efficient operation aligned with circular manufacturing objectives. These findings demonstrate that aligning learning objectives with decentralized decision structures is critical for effective negotiation-driven task allocation.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.