Paper detail

Echocardiographic Image Quality Assessment Using Deep Neural Networks

Echocardiography image quality assessment is not a trivial issue in transthoracic examination. As the in vivo examination of heart structures gained prominence in cardiac diagnosis, it has been affirmed that accurate diagnosis of the left ventricle functions is hugely dependent on the quality of echo images. Up till now, visual assessment of echo images is highly subjective and requires specific definition under clinical pathologies. While poor-quality images impair quantifications and diagnosis, the inherent variations in echocardiographic image quality standards indicates the complexity faced among different observers and provides apparent evidence for incoherent assessment under clinical trials, especially with less experienced cardiologists. In this research, our aim was to analyse and define specific quality attributes mostly discussed by experts and present a fully trained convolutional neural network model for assessing such quality features objectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.