Paper detail

Echelon: Two-Tier Malware Detection for Raw Executables to Reduce False Alarms

Existing malware detection approaches suffer from a simplistic trade-off between false positive rate (FPR) and true positive rate (TPR) due to a single tier classification approach, where the two measures adversely affect one another. The practical implication for malware detection is that FPR must be kept at an acceptably low level while TPR remains high. To this end, we propose a two-tiered learning, called ``Echelon", from raw byte data with no need for hand-crafted features. The first tier locks FPR at a specified target level, whereas the second tier improves TPR while maintaining the locked FPR. The core of Echelon lies at extracting activation information of the hidden layers of first tier model for constructing a stronger second tier model. Echelon is a framework in that it allows any existing CNN based model to be adapted in both tiers. We present experimental results of evaluating Echelon by adapting the state-of-the-art malware detection model ``Malconv" in the first and second tiers.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.