Paper detail

Earned Benefit Maximization in Social Networks Under Budget Constraint

Given a social network with nonuniform selection cost of the users, the problem of \textit{Budgeted Influence Maximization} (BIM in short) asks for selecting a subset of the nodes within an allocated budget for initial activation, such that due to the cascading effect, influence in the network is maximized. In this paper, we study this problem with a variation, where a set of nodes are designated as target nodes, each of them is assigned with a benefit value, that can be earned by influencing them, and our goal is to maximize the earned benefit by initially activating a set of nodes within the budget. We call this problem as the \textsc{Earned Benefit Maximization Problem}. First, we show that this problem is NP\mbox{-}Hard and the benefit function is \textit{monotone}, \textit{sub\mbox{-}modular} under the \textit{Independent Cascade Model} of diffusion. We propose an incremental greedy strategy for this problem and show, with minor modification it gives $(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{e}})$\mbox{-}factor approximation guarantee on the earned benefit. Next, by exploiting the sub\mbox{-}modularity property of the benefit function, we improve the efficiency of the proposed greedy algorithm. Then, we propose a hop\mbox{-}based heuristic method, which works based on the computation of the `expected earned benefit' of the effective neighbors corresponding to the target nodes. Finally, we perform a series of extensive experiments with four real\mbox{-}life, publicly available social network datasets. From the experiments, we observe that the seed sets selected by the proposed algorithms can achieve more benefit compared to many existing methods. Particularly, the hop\mbox{-}based approach is found to be more efficient than the other ones for solving this problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.