Paper detail

Early Detection for Multiversion Concurrency Control Conflicts in Hyperledger Fabric

Hyperledger Fabric is a popular permissioned blockchain system that features a highly modular and extensible system for deploying permissioned blockchains which are expected to have a major effect on a wide range of sectors. Unlike traditional blockchain systems such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric uses the EOV model for transaction processing: the submitted transactions are executed by the endorsing peer, ordered and batched by the ordering services, and validated by the validating peers. Due to this EOV workflow, a well-documented issue that arises is the multi-version concurrency control conflict. This happens when two transactions try to writes and read the same key in the ledger at the same time. Existing solutions to address this problem includes eliminating blocks in favor of streaming transactions, repairing conflicts during the ordering phase, and automatically merging the conflicting transactions using CRDT (Conflict Free Replicated Data) techniques. In this paper, we propose a novel solution called Early Detection for MVCC Conflicts. Our solution detects the conflicting transactions at an early stage of the transaction execution instead of processing them until the validation phase to be aborted. The advantage of our solution is that it detects conflict as soon as possible to minimize the overhead of conflicting transaction on the network resulting in the reduction of the end-to-end transaction latency and the increase of the system's effective throughput. We have successfully implemented our solution in Hyperledger Fabric. We propose three different implementations which realize early detection. Our results show that our solutions all perform better than the baseline Fabric, with our best solution SyncMap which improves the goodput by up to 23% and reduces the latency by up to 80%.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.