Paper detail

Dynamics of hot random hyperbolic graphs

We derive the most basic dynamical properties of random hyperbolic graphs (the distributions of contact and intercontact durations) in the hot regime (network temperature $T > 1$). We show that for sufficiently large networks the contact distribution decays as a power law with exponent $2+T > 3$ for durations $t > T$, while for $t < T$ it exhibits exponential-like decays. This result holds irrespective of the expected degree distribution, as long as it has a finite $T^{\text{th}}$ moment. Otherwise, the contact distribution depends on the expected degree distribution and we show that if the latter is a power law with exponent $γ\in (2, T+1]$, then the former decays as a power law with exponent $γ+1 > 3$. On the other hand, the intercontact distribution exhibits power-law decays with exponent $2-T \in (0, 1)$ for $T \in (1,2)$, while for $T > 2$ it displays linear decays with a slope that depends on the observation interval. This result holds irrespective of the expected degree distribution as long as it has a finite $T^{\text{th}}$ moment if $T \in (1,2)$, or a finite second moment if $T > 2$. Otherwise, the intercontact distribution depends on the expected degree distribution and if the latter is a power law with exponent $γ\in (2, 3)$, then the former decays as a power law with exponent $3-γ\in (0,1)$. Thus, hot random hyperbolic graphs can give rise to contact and intercontact distributions that both decay as power laws. These power laws however are unrealistic for the case of the intercontact distribution, as their exponent is always less than one. These results mean that hot random hyperbolic graphs are not adequate for modeling real temporal networks, in stark contrast to cold random hyperbolic graphs ($T < 1$). Since the configuration model emerges at $T \to \infty$, these results also suggest that this is not an adequate null temporal network model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.