Paper detail

Dynamics of Atomic Steps on GaN (0001) during Vapor Phase Epitaxy

Images of the morphology of GaN (0001) surfaces often show half-unit-cell-height steps separating a sequence of terraces having alternating large and small widths. This can be explained by the $αβαβ$ stacking sequence of the wurtzite crystal structure, which results in steps with alternating $A$ and $B$ edge structures for the lowest energy step azimuths, i.e. steps normal to $[0 1 \bar{1} 0]$ type directions. Predicted differences in the adatom attachment kinetics at $A$ and $B$ steps would lead to alternating $α$ and $β$ terrace widths. However, because of the difficulty of experimentally identifying which step is $A$ or $B$, it has not been possible to determine the absolute difference in their behavior, e.g. which step has higher adatom attachment rate constants. Here we show that surface X-ray scattering can measure the fraction of $α$ and $β$ terraces, and thus unambiguously differentiate the growth dynamics of $A$ and $B$ steps. We first present calculations of the intensity profiles of GaN crystal truncation rods (CTRs) that demonstrate a marked dependence on the $α$ terrace fraction $f_α$. We then present surface X-ray scattering measurements performed \textit{in situ} during homoepitaxial growth on (0001) GaN by vapor phase epitaxy. By analyzing the shapes of the $(1 0 \bar{1} L)$ and $(0 1 \bar{1} L)$ CTRs, we determine that the steady-state $f_α$ increases at higher growth rate, indicating that attachment rate constants are higher at $A$ steps than at $B$ steps. We also observe the dynamics of $f_α$ after growth conditions are changed. The results are analyzed using a Burton-Cabrera-Frank model for a surface with alternating step types, to extract values for the kinetic parameters of $A$ and $B$ steps. These are compared with predictions for GaN (0001).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.