Abstract

Images of the morphology of GaN (0001) surfaces often show half-unit-cell-height steps separating a sequence of terraces having alternating large and small widths. This can be explained by the αβαβαβαβ stacking sequence of the wurtzite crystal structure, which results in steps with alternating AA and BB edge structures for the lowest energy step azimuths, i.e. steps normal to [011ˉ0][0 1 \bar{1} 0] type directions. Predicted differences in the adatom attachment kinetics at AA and BB steps would lead to alternating αα and ββ terrace widths. However, because of the difficulty of experimentally identifying which step is AA or BB, it has not been possible to determine the absolute difference in their behavior, e.g. which step has higher adatom attachment rate constants. Here we show that surface X-ray scattering can measure the fraction of αα and ββ terraces, and thus unambiguously differentiate the growth dynamics of AA and BB steps. We first present calculations of the intensity profiles of GaN crystal truncation rods (CTRs) that demonstrate a marked dependence on the αα terrace fraction fαf_α. We then present surface X-ray scattering measurements performed \textit{in situ} during homoepitaxial growth on (0001) GaN by vapor phase epitaxy. By analyzing the shapes of the (101ˉL)(1 0 \bar{1} L) and (011ˉL)(0 1 \bar{1} L) CTRs, we determine that the steady-state fαf_α increases at higher growth rate, indicating that attachment rate constants are higher at AA steps than at BB steps. We also observe the dynamics of fαf_α after growth conditions are changed. The results are analyzed using a Burton-Cabrera-Frank model for a surface with alternating step types, to extract values for the kinetic parameters of AA and BB steps. These are compared with predictions for GaN (0001).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.