Paper detail

Dynamics of accretion and winds in tidal disruption events

We have constructed self-similar models of a time-dependent accretion disk in both sub and super-Eddington phases with wind outflows for tidal disruption events (TDEs). The physical input parameters are the black hole (BH) mass $M_{\bullet}$, specific orbital energy $E$ and angular momentum $J$, star mass $M_{\star}$ and radius $R_{\star}$. We consider the sub-Eddington phase to be total pressure (model A1) and gas pressure (model A2) dominated. In contrast, the super-Eddington phase is dominated by radiation pressure (model B) with Thomson opacity. We derive the viscosity prescribed by the stress tensor, $Π_{rϕ}\propto Σ_d^b r^d$ where $Σ_d$ is the surface density of the disk, $r$ is the radius and $b$ and $d$ are constants. The specific choice of radiative or $α$ viscosity is motivated, and its parameters are decided by the expected disk luminosity and evolution time scale being in the observed range. The disk evolves due to mass loss by accretion onto the black hole and outflowing wind, and mass gain by fallback of the debris; this results in an increasing outer radius. We have simulated the luminosity profile for both sub and super-Eddington disks. As an illustrative example, we fit our models to the observations in X-ray, UV, and Optical of four TDE events and deduce the physical parameters above.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.