Paper detail

Dynamical mechanisms of flexible phase-locking in cortical theta oscillators

Oscillatory activity in auditory cortex is thought to play a central role in auditory and speech processing by synchronizing neural rhythms to external acoustic features of the speech stream. To support this function, cortical oscillators must flexibly phase-lock to inputs spanning a wide range of timescales, including rhythms substantially slower than their intrinsic frequency. Here we identify a general dynamical mechanism by which intrinsic inhibitory currents operating on multiple timescales enable such flexible phase-locking. Using tools from dynamical systems theory, we show that interactions between slow and superslow inhibitory processes generate prolonged post-input recovery delays through delayed Hopf phenomena, thereby substantially expanding the frequency range over which entrainment can occur. We demonstrate this mechanisms in a biophysically grounded cortical theta oscillator model for speech segmentation. Specifically, we show that both a theta-timescale (4-8 Hz) inhibitory current $I_m$ and a slower delta-timescale (1-4 Hz) inhibitory potassium current $I_{\rm K_{SS}}$ are crucial for entrainment flexibility. Their interaction creates a three-timescale structure that gives rise to pronounced delay phenomena associated with a delayed Hopf bifurcation (DHB). Interestingly, the superslow $I_{\rm K_{SS}}$ and the associated DHB play little role in the unforced oscillatory dynamics, but are recruited to support phase locking under external forcing. Moreover, the intermediate-timescale current $I_m$, rather than being redundant, further expands the phase-locking range by prolonging delayed recovery along the superslow manifold. Together, these results suggest that coordination among intrinsic inhibitory currents operating on multiple timescales may represent a key mechanism supporting flexible phase locking to rhythmic inputs in the brain.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.