Paper detail

Dynamical Mean Field Theory of the Gutzwiller-projected BCS Hamiltonian: Phase Fluctuations and the Pseudogap

One of the most prominent problems in high temperature superconductivity is the nature of the pseudogap phase in underdoped regimes; particularly important is the role of phase fluctuations. The Gutzwiller-projected BCS Hamiltonian is a useful model for high temperature superconductivity due to an exact mapping to the Heisenberg model at half filling and generally a very close connection to the t-J model at moderate doping. We develop the dynamical mean field theory for the d-wave BCS Hamiltonian with on-site repulsive interaction, $U$, physically imposing the partial Gutzwiller projection. For results, two pseudogap energy scales are identified: one associated with the bare pairing gap for the singlet formation and the other with the local phase coherence. The real superconducting gap determined from sharp coherence peaks in the density of states shows strong renormalization from the bare value due to $U$.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.