Paper detail

Dynamical Friction, Buoyancy and Core-Stalling -- I. A Non-perturbative Orbit-based Analysis

We examine the origin of dynamical friction using a non-perturbative, orbit-based approach. Unlike the standard perturbative approach, in which dynamical friction arises from the LBK torque due to pure resonances, this alternative, complementary view nicely illustrates how a massive perturber significantly changes the energies and angular momenta of field particles on near-resonant orbits, with friction arising from an imbalance between particles that gain energy and those that lose energy. We treat dynamical friction in a spherical host system as a restricted three-body problem. This treatment is applicable in the `slow' regime, in which the perturber sinks slowly and the standard perturbative framework fails due to the onset of non-linearities. Hence it is especially suited to investigate the origin of core-stalling: the cessation of dynamical friction in central constant-density cores. We identify three different families of near-co-rotation-resonant orbits that dominate the contribution to dynamical friction. Their relative contribution is governed by the Lagrange points (fixed points in the co-rotating frame). In particular, one of the three families, which we call Pac-Man orbits because of their appearance in the co-rotating frame, is unique to cored density distributions. When the perturber reaches a central core, a bifurcation of the Lagrange points drastically changes the orbital make-up, with Pac-Man orbits becoming dominant. In addition, due to relatively small gradients in the distribution function inside a core, the net torque from these Pac-Man orbits becomes positive (enhancing), thereby effectuating a dynamical buoyancy. We argue that core stalling occurs where this buoyancy is balanced by friction.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.