Paper detail

Dynamic Priority Queue: An SDRAM Arbiter With Bounded Access Latencies for Tight WCET Calculation

This report introduces a shared resource arbitration scheme "DPQ - Dynamic Priority Queue" which provides bandwidth guarantees and low worst case latency to each master in an MPSoC. Being a non-trivial candidate for timing analysis, SDRAM has been chosen as a showcase, but the approach is valid for any shared resource arbitration. Due to its significant cost, data rate and physical size advantages, SDRAM is a potential candidate for cost sensitive, safety critical and space conserving systems. The variable access latency is a major drawback of SDRAM that induces largely over estimated Worst Case Execution Time (WCET) bounds of applications. In this report we present the DPQ together with an algorithm to predict the shared SDRAM's worst case latencies. We use the approach to calculate WCET bounds of six hardware tasks executing on an Altera Cyclone III FPGA with shared DDR2 memory. The results show that the DPQ is a fair arbitration scheme and produces low WCET bounds.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.