Paper detail

Dynamic dependence of nonequilibrium work limits the validity of the Jarzynski Equality

The Jarzynski equality (JE) is analyzed in regard to its validity for both quasi-static transformations in the thermodynamic limit and Hamiltonian evolutions of the work protocol. In the first case, we show that the JE holds for isothermal transformations only; in the second case, we show that the work done (linked to the final state Hamiltonian) depends on the temporal dynamics of the work protocol (including its speed), thus precluding the possibility of identifying it with the free energy or any other thermodynamic state function. Even in the case of thermodynamic limit and infinitesimally slow transformations of the Hamiltonian (adiabatic invariance) following states of thermodynamic equilibrium, the resulting work expression does not default to the JE, but to the work relation for adiabatic thermodynamic transformations, W=Delta U, where W is work and U is internal energy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.