Paper detail

Dynamic Approximate Maximum Matching in the Distributed Vertex Partition Model

We initiate the study of approximate maximum matching in the vertex partition model, for graphs subject to dynamic changes. We assume that the $n$ vertices of the graph are partitioned among $k$ players, who execute a distributed algorithm and communicate via message passing. An adaptive adversary may perform dynamic updates to the graph topology by inserting or removing edges between the nodes, and the algorithm needs to respond to these changes by adapting the output of the players, with the goal of maintaining an approximate maximum matching. The main performance metric in this setting is the algorithm's update time, which corresponds to the number of rounds required for updating the solution upon an adversarial change. For the standard setting of single-edge insertions and deletions, we give a randomized Las Vegas algorithm with an expected update time of $O( \lceil \frac{\sqrt{m}}{βk} \rceil )$ rounds that maintains a $\frac{2}{3}$-approximate maximum matching that is also maximal, where $m$ is the number of edges in the graph and $β$ is the available link bandwidth. For batch-dynamic updates, where the adversary may insert up to $\ell\ge 1$ edges at once, we prove the following. There is a randomized algorithm that succeeds with high probability in maintaining a $\frac{2}{3}$-approximate maximum matching and has a worst case update time of $O(\lceil\frac{\ell\log n}{\sqrt{βk}}\rceil )$ rounds. Any algorithm for maintaining a maximal matching without 3-augmenting paths under batches of $\ell$-edge insertions has an update time of $Ω( \frac{\ell}{βk \log n} )$ rounds in the worst case.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.