Paper detail

Dynamic analysis of tapping-mode AFM with sidewall probe subjected to effects of probe mass and sidewall extension

Atomic Force Microscopy with SideWall (AFM SW) is widely used for nano-scale surface measurements at side surfaces. In the current study, by taking into consideration the effects of sidewall beam and its probe, an analytical method is developed to explore the dynamics of AFM-SW. The effect of probe mass, sidewall extension length, and tip sample interactions on the resonance frequencies and amplitude of Micro-Cantilever is widely investigated. The obtained results of the analytical model demonstrate the significant effect of these parameters on the dynamics of AFM-SW. To verify the accuracy of the analytical model, the obtained results are compared against the simulation data of previously published works and a good agreement is observed. Resonance Frequency (RF) of cantilever clearly declines when the mass of probe is taken to account, especially in higher RFs. Besides, probe effect on RF is higher when sidewall beam is longer. Resonance frequency decreases when tip-sample interaction or probe mass is high, yet the amount of reduction is intensified when probe mass and interaction together are at higher point. An analytical method is developed to explore the dynamics of Atomic Force Microscopy with considering SideWall beam effects (AFM-SW). The effect of probe mass, sidewall extension length, and tip sample interactions on vibration of micro-cantilever is investigated. The obtained results are compared with previous literatures. The results show that Resonance Frequency (RF) of cantilever declines when the mass of probe is taken to account. Besides, probe effect on RF is higher when sidewall beam is longer. Resonance frequency decreases when tip-sample interaction or probe mass is high, yet the amount of reduction is intensified when they are at higher point.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.