Paper detail

Dualizing Le Cam's method for functional estimation, with applications to estimating the unseens

Le Cam's method (or the two-point method) is a commonly used tool for obtaining statistical lower bound and especially popular for functional estimation problems. This work aims to explain and give conditions for the tightness of Le Cam's lower bound in functional estimation from the perspective of convex duality. Under a variety of settings it is shown that the maximization problem that searches for the best two-point lower bound, upon dualizing, becomes a minimization problem that optimizes the bias-variance tradeoff among a family of estimators. For estimating linear functionals of a distribution our work strengthens prior results of Donoho-Liu \cite{DL91} (for quadratic loss) by dropping the Hölderian assumption on the modulus of continuity. For exponential families our results extend those of Juditsky-Nemirovski \cite{JN09} by characterizing the minimax risk for the quadratic loss under weaker assumptions on the exponential family. We also provide an extension to the high-dimensional setting for estimating separable functionals. Notably, coupled with tools from complex analysis, this method is particularly effective for characterizing the ``elbow effect'' -- the phase transition from parametric to nonparametric rates. As the main application we derive sharp minimax rates in the Distinct elements problem (given a fraction $p$ of colored balls from an urn containing $d$ balls, the optimal error of estimating the number of distinct colors is $\tilde Θ(d^{-\frac{1}{2}\min\{\frac{p}{1-p},1\}})$) and the Fisher's species problem (given $n$ iid observations from an unknown distribution, the optimal prediction error of the number of unseen symbols in the next (unobserved) $r \cdot n$ observations is $\tilde Θ(n^{-\min\{\frac{1}{r+1},\frac{1}{2}\}})$).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.