Duality and Tilting for Commutative DG Rings

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

We consider commutative DG rings (better known as nonpositive strongly commutative associative unital DG algebras). For such a DG ring AA we define the notions of perfect, tilting, dualizing, Cohen-Macaulay and rigid DG AA-modules. Geometrically perfect DG modules are defined by a local condition on Spec⁡Aˉ\operatorname{Spec} \bar{A}, where Aˉ:=Spec⁡ H⁡0(A)\bar{A} := \operatorname{Spec} \, \operatorname{H}^0(A). Algebraically perfect DG modules are those that can be obtained from AA by finitely many shifts, direct summands and cones. Tilting DG modules are those that have inverses w.r.t. the derived tensor product; their isomorphism classes form the derived Picard group DPic⁡(A)\operatorname{DPic}(A). Dualizing DG modules are a generalization of Grothendieck's original definition (and here AA has to be cohomologically pseudo-noetherian). Cohen-Macaulay DG modules are the duals (w.r.t. a given dualizing DG module) of finite Aˉ\bar{A}-modules. Rigid DG AA-modules, relative to a commutative base ring KK, are defined using the squaring operation, and this is a generalization of Van den Bergh's original definition. The techniques we use are the standard ones of derived categories, with a few improvements. We introduce a new method for studying DG AA-modules: Cech resolutions of DG AA-modules corresponding to open coverings of Spec⁡Aˉ\operatorname{Spec} \bar{A}. Here are some of the new results obtained in this paper:... [truncated] The functorial properties of Cohen-Macaulay DG modules that we establish here are needed for our work on rigid dualizing complexes over commutative rings, schemes and Deligne-Mumford stacks. We pose several conjectures regarding existence and uniqueness of rigid DG modules over commutative DG rings.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.