Paper detail

Drude weight, Meissner weight, rotational inertia of bosonic superfluids: how are they distinguished?

The Drude weight, the quantity which distinguishes metals from insulators, is proportional to the second derivative of the ground state energy with respect to a flux at zero flux. The same expression also appears in the definition of the Meissner weight, the quantity which indicates superconductivity, as well as in the definition of non-classical rotational inertia of bosonic superfluids. It is shown that the difference between these quantities depends on the interpretation of the average momentum term, which can be understood as the expectation value of the total momentum (Drude weight), the sum of the expectation values of single momenta (rotational inertia of a superfluid), or the sum over expectation values of momentum pairs (Meissner weight). This distinction appears naturally when the current from which the particular transport quantity is derived is cast in terms of shift operators.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.