Paper detail

Dreaming neural networks: rigorous results

Recently a daily routine for associative neural networks has been proposed: the network Hebbian-learns during the awake state (thus behaving as a standard Hopfield model), then, during its sleep state, optimizing information storage, it consolidates pure patterns and removes spurious ones: this forces the synaptic matrix to collapse to the projector one (ultimately approaching the Kanter-Sompolinksy model). This procedure keeps the learning Hebbian-based (a biological must) but, by taking advantage of a (properly stylized) sleep phase, still reaches the maximal critical capacity (for symmetric interactions). So far this emerging picture (as well as the bulk of papers on unlearning techniques) was supported solely by mathematically-challenging routes, e.g. mainly replica-trick analysis and numerical simulations: here we rely extensively on Guerra's interpolation techniques developed for neural networks and, in particular, we extend the generalized stochastic stability approach to the case. Confining our description within the replica symmetric approximation (where the previous ones lie), the picture painted regarding this generalization (and the previously existing variations on theme) is here entirely confirmed. Further, still relying on Guerra's schemes, we develop a systematic fluctuation analysis to check where ergodicity is broken (an analysis entirely absent in previous investigations). We find that, as long as the network is awake, ergodicity is bounded by the Amit-Gutfreund-Sompolinsky critical line (as it should), but, as the network sleeps, sleeping destroys spin glass states by extending both the retrieval as well as the ergodic region: after an entire sleeping session the solely surviving regions are retrieval and ergodic ones and this allows the network to achieve the perfect retrieval regime (the number of storable patterns equals the number of neurons in the network).

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.