Paper detail

Drag Coefficient of a Rigid Spherical Particle in a Near-Critical Binary Fluid Mixture beyond the Regime of the Gaussian Model

The drag coefficient of a rigid spherical particle deviates from the Stokes law when it is put into a near-critical fluid mixture in the homogeneous phase with the critical composition. The deviation ($Δγ_{\rm d}$) is experimentally shown to depend approximately linearly on the correlation length far from the particle ($ξ_\infty$), and is suggested to be caused by the preferential attraction between one component and the particle surface. In contrast, the dependence was shown to be much steeper in the previous theoretical studies based on the Gaussian free-energy density. In the vicinity of the particle, especially when the adsorption of the preferred component makes the composition strongly off-critical, the correlation length becomes very small as compared with $ξ_\infty$. This spacial inhomogeneity, not considered in the previous theoretical studies, can influence the dependence of $Δγ_{\rm d}$ on $ξ_\infty$. To examine this possibility, we here apply the local renormalized functional theory, which was previously proposed to explain the interaction of walls immersed in a (near-)critical binary fluid mixture, describing the preferential attraction in terms of the surface field. The free-energy density in this theory, coarse-grained up to the local correlation length, has much complicated dependence on the order parameter, as compared with the Gaussian free-energy density. Still, a concise expression of the drag coefficient, which was derived in one of the previous theoretical studies, turns out to be available in the present formulation. We show that, as $ξ_{\infty}$ becomes larger, the dependence of $Δγ_{\rm d}$ on $ξ_\infty$ becomes distinctly gradual and close to the linear dependence.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.