Paper detail

Drag coefficient for the air-sea exchange in hurricane conditions

A physical model is proposed for the prediction of the non-monotonic variation of the drag coefficient, C_d, with wind speed. The model approximates the effective C_d by the area-weighted averaging of the distinct drag coefficients associated with the foam-free and foam totally-covered portions of the sea surface, and identifies the roughness of the sea surface totally covered by foam with the foam bubble size. Based on the available optical and radiometric measurements of the foam fractional coverage and the foam bubble size, the present model yields the effective C_d which is in fair agreement with that obtained from field measurements of the vertical variation of mean wind speed (Powell et al., 2003), which showed a reduction of C_d with wind speed rising to hurricane conditions. The present approach opens new opportunities for modeling of drag coefficient in hurricane conditions by using radiometric measurements instead of direct wind speed measurements.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.