Double charm production in single- and double-parton scattering

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

We discuss production of two pairs of ccˉc \bar c in proton-proton collisions at the LHC. Both double-parton scattering (DPS) and single-parton scattering (SPS) contributions are included in the analysis. Each step of DPS is calculated within ktk_t-factorization approach which effectively includes some next-to-leading order corrections. The discussed mechanisms unavoidably lead to the production of pairs of mesons: DiDjD_i D_j (each containing cc quarks) or DˉiDˉj\bar D_i \bar D_j (each containing cˉ\bar c antiquarks). We calculate corresponding differential distribution for (D0D0(D^0 D^0 + Dˉ0Dˉ0)\bar D^0 \bar D^0) production. Within large theoretical uncertainties the predicted DPS cross section is fairly similar to the cross section measured recently by the LHCb collaboration. We also present first results for the 2→42 \to 4 single-parton scattering gg→ccˉccˉg g \to c \bar c c \bar c subprocess for the first time fully within the ktk_t-factorization approach. In this calculation we have used an off-shell matrix element squared calculated using recently developed techniques. The results are compared with our earlier result obtained within the collinear approach. Only slightly larger cross sections are obtained than in the case of the collinear approach but still the SPS mechanism contribution is much smaller than the DPS one. Inclusion of transverse momenta of gluons entering the hard process leads to a much stronger azimuthal decorrelation between ccc c and cˉcˉ\bar c \bar c than in the collinear-factorization approach. A comparison to predictions of double parton scattering (DPS) results and the LHCb data strongly suggests that the assumption of two fully independent DPS (gg→ccˉ⊗gg→ccˉg g \to c \bar c \otimes g g \to c \bar c) may be too approximate.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.