Paper detail

Double-Barreled Question Detection at Momentive

Momentive offers solutions in market research, customer experience, and enterprise feedback. The technology is gleaned from the billions of real responses to questions asked on the platform. However, people may create biased questions. A double-barreled question (DBQ) is a common type of biased question that asks two aspects in one question. For example, "Do you agree with the statement: The food is yummy, and the service is great.". This DBQ confuses survey respondents because there are two parts in a question. DBQs impact both the survey respondents and the survey owners. Momentive aims to detect DBQs and recommend survey creators to make a change towards gathering high quality unbiased survey data. Previous research work has suggested detecting DBQs by checking the existence of grammatical conjunction. While this is a simple rule-based approach, this method is error-prone because conjunctions can also exist in properly constructed questions. We present an end-to-end machine learning approach for DBQ classification in this work. We handled this imbalanced data using active learning, and compared state-of-the-art embedding algorithms to transform text data into vectors. Furthermore, we proposed a model interpretation technique propagating the vector-level SHAP values to a SHAP value for each word in the questions. We concluded that the word2vec subword embedding with maximum pooling is the optimal word embedding representation in terms of precision and running time in the offline experiments using the survey data at Momentive. The A/B test and production metrics indicate that this model brings a positive change to the business. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first machine learning framework for DBQ detection, and it successfully differentiates Momentive from the competitors. We hope our work sheds light on machine learning approaches for bias question detection.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.